| |
Library & Information Science: Cataloguing
Banerjee, K. (2001). Taking advantage of outsourcing options: using purchased record sets to maximize cataloguing effectiveness. Cataloguing and Classification Quarterly, 32 (1), 55-64. |
Chaudhry, A. S., & Periasamy, M. (2001). A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals. Library Review, 50(9), 434-443. Retrieved 13 April, 2004, from ProQuest. |
Fattahi, R. (1995). A comparison between the online catalogue and the card catalogue. Library Review , 44, 44-58. Retrieved 28 March, 2004, from ProQuest. |
Ferguson , S. & Hebels, R. (1998). Computers for librarians: an introduction to systems and applications. Chapter 3 - Catalogues and shared cataloguing, (pp. 65-87). Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies. |
Hinton, M. J. (2002). On cataloging internet resources: voices from the field. Journal of Internet Cataloging, 5 (1), 53-67. |
Hoerman, H. L. (2002). Why does everybody hate cataloguing? Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 34 (1/2), 31-41. |
Matthews, J. (2000). The value of information in library catalogs. Information Outlook, 4, 18-24, Retrieved March 29, 2004, from Proquest. |
Murphy, C. (1998). The online catalog on the way to the millennium. Multimedia Schools, 5, 20-25. Retrieved March 28, 2004, from Proquest. |
Oddy, P. (1997). Who dares, wins: libraries and catalogues for a postmodern world. Library Review, 46(5), 307-317. Retrieved 13 April, 2004, from ProQuest. |
Back to Top
Banerjee, K. (2001). Taking advantage of outsourcing options: using purchased record sets to maximize cataloguing effectiveness. Cataloguing and Classification Quarterly, 32 (1), 55-64.
Libraries can manage their catalogued information by purchasing record sets or by creating individual records. The former can be less time consuming and resource-demanding. However, there are pros and cons associated with both methods. This article would be beneficial to those seeking information on the features of record set purchasing as a method of information management in the library. The article has been compiled with a logical format, using clear headings for each new section. The content of the article has been well referenced, indicating other useful literature on the topic. The conclusion gives a precise account of the salient points expressed within the article.
Back to Top |
Chaudhry, A. S., & Periasamy, M. (2001). A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals. Library Review, 50(9), 434-443. Retrieved 13 April, 2004, from ProQuest.
Cataloguing is a key tool for managing information in a library system. The changeable and complex nature of electronic materials has posed a particular challenge for the information specialist working in the area of cataloguing and record creation. In a study conducted in Singapore , nineteen libraries were evaluated to compare their cataloguing procedures. The results of the study are thoroughly presented and explored, making this paper a useful aid for anyone trying to select a suitable cataloguing method for a library. Libraries were chosen for the study based on the availability of their records and policies on the Internet, which limited the extent of the study and suggests that further research is necessary.
Back to Top |
Fattahi, R. (1995). A comparison between the online catalogue and the card catalogue. Library Review, 44, 44-58. Retrieved 28 March, 2004, from ProQuest.
Written in 1995 when online catalogues were relatively new, this article gives a comparison between online and card catalogues. It also deals with the importance of standardisation in bibliographic records. It is interesting to note that even at this early stage, it was found that the majority of users would rather use the online catalogue over the card catalogue. The article reveals a number of advantages of the online catalogue, ranging from the ease of bibliographic record creation, to more effective user search and retrieval capabilities. The information specialist will find it interesting to read this article and reflect on the views of online cataloguing not so many years ago, compared to the attitudes held today. The author has included an impressive list of references and further readings.
Back to Top |
Ferguson , S. & Hebels, R. (1998). Computers for librarians: an introduction to systems and applications. Chapter 3 - Catalogues and shared cataloguing, (pp. 65-87). Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies.
This book chapter describes the different forms of catalogues used in libraries and covers the pertinent issues relating to each. The author has provided a list of “learning objectives”, indicating what knowledge the reader should possess on completion, along with a list of keywords used throughout. Other valuable features include a list of references, further readings and review questions. New sections of the chapter are marked by headings and sub-headings, improving the ease of reading and referral. The chapter would be a valuable reference tool for anyone working in the library environment or studying in the area. It is designed as an introductory text for those seeking to learn the broad principles of cataloguing as a system of information management.
Back to Top |
Hinton, M. J. (2002). On cataloging internet resources: voices from the field. Journal of Internet Cataloging, 5 (1), 53-67.
This article on internet resource management was compiled in response to interviews carried out with librarians from six institutions of higher learning. An account is given of the process behind the selection of candidates and the collection of data. It gives a brief description of how these institutions began cataloguing internet resources and the issues they faced. Respondents from each institution considered internet cataloguing an important part of thorough information management. This is a valuable article as it contains direct statements from professionals working in information management. The responses given by the interviewees are diverse and offer a thorough insight into the various issues. This article is a valuable contribution to the information science literature.
Back to Top |
Hoerman, H. L. (2002). Why does everybody hate cataloguing? Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 34 (1/2), 31-41.
As a cataloguer, Hoerman gives her views in relation to the question of the article title. She states at the beginning that it is written as an “o pinionated and very informal exploration” of the issues, which prepares the reader for the style of the material to follow. The article reveals some of the tensions which exist between reference librarians and cataloguers. Hoerman's use of cataloguing terms suggests that her intended audience consists of individuals who work in the library environment or are studying in the field. The author discusses the consequences that may accompany the diminution of education in the cataloguing field. She uses some interesting metaphors throughout her article to illustrate her points of view. This is a thought-provoking article, which poses many questions for further thought and investigation.
Back to Top |
Matthews, J. (2000). The value of information in library catalogs. Information Outlook, 4, 18-24, Retrieved March 29, 2004, from Proquest.
This article deals with the value of the information in library catalogues with regards to MARC records. To allow a better understanding of the value of MARC records, Matthews first provides readers with various meanings of the word “value”. The author not only deals with issues attached to MARC records in relation to the library itself, but also with how they affect library users. The article contains some interesting statistics revealing the costs involved with purchasing and enhancing records. The article would be of interest to cataloguers, students of library science and people involved in purchasing records. Matthews provides practical implications in relation to his statements. The information is well-structured, with sub-headings used throughout.
Back to Top |
Murphy, C. (1998). The online catalog on the way to the millennium. Multimedia Schools, 5, 20-25. Retrieved March 28, 2004, from Proquest.
This article discusses the use of the Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) as a way to manage information in the school library environment. The article gives a brief description of the evolution of the online catalogue and the roles of the educator. It provides statistics on the kinds of systems school libraries are using, and a brief description of the elements present in a GUI (Graphical User Interface). The length of the article restricts the detail of the descriptions, but it does however cover a range of topics. This is a useful article for those requiring basic information about online catalogues. It will also help the school librarian to learn about the use of OPACs for information management purposes.
Back to Top |
Oddy, P. (1997). Who dares, wins: libraries and catalogues for a postmodern world. Library Review, 46(5), 307-317. Retrieved 13 April, 2004, from ProQuest.
This article opens with an amusing anecdote about a television show and a lottery ticket, which makes a change to most other materials on cataloguing! The author uses the analogies to consider the issues of information management, library funding, the value of libraries to the user and the outsourcing of catalogue records. He claims that librarians must map out a feasible, fulfilling future for themselves and their libraries, and shares his own library's experiences in trying to meet this goal. The article suffers from the lack of sectioning and an abstract, which compromises its structure and readability. However, the interesting and casual nature of the writing helps to offset these problems.
Back to Top |
|
